The largest barrier to successful completion of the intervention is parent attrition.
Conclusions and Implications The results of the survey indicated some surprising conclusions. Although the literature points to the necessity for psychological, especially neuropsychological, testing after TBI, many individuals are not receiving it.
When looking at the results of the study in terms of who has not recommended such testing, doctors and schools certainly stand out. Both doctors and schools are ostensibly in the business of assessing cognitive abilities, albeit for different reasons and from different perspectives.
It is suggested that they both routinely and consistently recommend neuropsychological evaluations after TBI. The study results concurred with earlier studies which have reported higher frequencies of problems after TBI in the areas of memory, concentration and word-finding or talking. Also, some symptoms cited as PostConcussional in other studies were reported, not just by PostConcussional or mild or moderate TBI patients, but by participants with more severe head trauma.
PostConcussional trauma has been placed in a separate category from severe head injury trauma in some psychological and medical studies. The recovery period from PostConcussional trauma had also been arbitrarily set at 6 months in some sources and 1 year in others.
This study showed that some individuals with mild or PostConcussional injurreported longer time frames of symptomatology. This study also showed that the symptoms between various degrees of brain trauma are often similar.
The study showed that the symptoms reported by mild, moderate and severe head trauma survivors included those reported under PostConcussional studies. PostConcussional and mild injury survivors should be told that symptoms can and do last longer than arbitrary 6 month or 1 year time frames.
Moderate and severe injury survivors may be counseled that measurable improvements in symptom severity in some categories are reported post-two-years TBI by this and other newer studies.
Eighty percent felt changed by their TBI. This change in self-image can be very upsetting for the survivor. The survivor and his personal network of family, friends, coworkers, etc.
There was no surprise in the finding that most of the survivors reported challenging emotional reactions such as sadness, confusion, anger, fear, shame and guilt to the TBI event itself.
The detachment or elation reaction is a potential mechanism for coping,too. However, individuals emitting this reaction may also have undergone a severe emotional trauma from the TBI event.
Others should be counseled that an attitude of complacency or elation on the part of the survivor may in fact mask brain injury, or more frightening emotional reactions going on internally or unconsciously for the survivor. The emotional response to the trauma may ultimately surface in other ways.
|How to Approach Writing a Case Study Research Paper||Re-evaluating a conceptual framework or theoretical model Addressing research limitations in your dissertation In the Research Limitations section of your Conclusions chapter, you will have inevitably detailed the potential flaws i. An inability to answer your research questions Theoretical and conceptual problems Limitations of your research strategy Problems of research quality Identifying what these research limitations were and proposing future research suggestions that address them is arguably the easiest and quickest ways to complete the Future Research section of your Conclusions chapter.|
|Types of future research suggestion | Lærd Dissertation||Find out how your study treats the first person before you use it.|
|Conclusions, Implications, Recommendations and Further Research||Bibliography Definition The term case study refers to both a method of analysis and a specific research design for examining a problem, both of which are used in most circumstances to generalize across populations. This tab focuses on the latter--how to design and organize a research paper in the social sciences that analyzes a specific case.|
|FUTURE RESEARCH||List page numbers of all figures.|
|Public involvement in research: assessing impact through a realist evaluation.||Chapter 9Conclusions and recommendations for future research How well have we achieved our original aim and objectives? The initially stated overarching aim of this research was to identify the contextual factors and mechanisms that are regularly associated with effective and cost-effective public involvement in research.|
The survivor himself, his loved ones, and other interested parties may not connect the TBI trauma and the subsequent unusual behaviors the survivor may manifest, such as withdrawal, anger,sadness, etc. Therefore, counselors should address these issues with the survivor, his or her family, and other interested parties.
There was a large array of both positive and negative responses to emotionally cope with th post-TBI period. People, including survivors, are different. Some respond more positively. Some respond more negatively.Conclusions, Implications, Recommendations and Further Research On the other hand, sometimes the survivor or his family or doctor will know exactly what limitations there are.
When limitations are reported to the school, modifications should be made. Recommendations for Further Research. If you do connect your study's limitations to suggestions for further research, be sure to explain the ways in which these unanswered questions may become more focused because of your study.
describe how does your research expand the study to include girls? When discussing the limitations of your research, be sure to.
STRUCTURE How to structure the Research Limitations section of your dissertation. There is no "one best way" to structure the Research Limitations section of your dissertation. However, we recommend a structure based on three moves: the announcing, reflecting and forward looking move.
The announcing move immediately allows you to identify the limitations of your dissertation and explain how. The content of the discussion section of your paper most often includes: This can be followed by any recommendations for further research.
However, do not offer recommendations which could have been easily addressed within the study. You should frame your suggestions by linking the need for further research to the limitations of your.
The initially stated overarching aim of this research was to identify the contextual factors and mechanisms that are regularly associated with effective and cost-effective public involvement in research.
While recognising the limitations of our analysis, we believe we have largely achieved this in our revised theory of public involvement in research set out in Chapter 8.
Chapter 8: Conclusions and Recommendations for Further Work Recommendations for Further Work The research that has been undertaken for this thesis has highlighted a .